Basic User
Uses familiar words, expressions and simple connected language for immediate everyday needs and routine exchanges.
Understand your English level, what you can do at each stage, and how CEFR is used by learners, teachers and institutions worldwide.
CEFR proficiency chart
Proficient User
Flexible, precise and complex language use
Independent User
Connected communication with growing independence
Basic User
Familiar language for immediate everyday needs
The framework
CEFR is the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Developed through the Council of Europe, it provides shared language for describing what a person can understand and communicate at different stages of proficiency. Although it originated in Europe, its level labels are used internationally by learners, teachers, course providers, employers, universities and examination organisations.
The framework is built around practical language activity rather than a list of grammar points. Its descriptors explain what a learner can do when listening, reading, speaking, interacting and writing. That makes a CEFR level more useful when it is connected to real evidence: the kinds of texts a learner understands, the conversations they can sustain and the messages they can produce for a particular purpose.
CEFR is not an English examination, certificate or curriculum. A test may map results to CEFR, and a course may organise outcomes by CEFR level, but those organisations remain responsible for their own assessment quality and claims. The framework should be used as a reference point—not as a substitute for observing a learner’s actual performance.
Official terminology
The six levels sit inside three broad bands. These labels describe increasing communicative independence; they are not percentages and should not be treated as a simple linear score.
Uses familiar words, expressions and simple connected language for immediate everyday needs and routine exchanges.
Communicates across a growing range of situations, explains ideas and manages many academic, travel and workplace tasks independently.
Handles demanding language flexibly and precisely, including complex, abstract, academic, professional and specialist communication.
CEFR level meanings
Each level below combines an overall explanation with practical examples. A real learner may show different levels across different skills.
A1 learners can understand and use familiar everyday expressions, introduce themselves and exchange very simple personal information when the other person speaks slowly and clearly.
A2 learners can communicate in routine situations involving familiar topics such as family, shopping, work, local places and daily activities.
B1 learners can deal with many situations that arise while travelling, understand the main points of clear standard input and produce connected language about familiar interests.
B2 learners can understand the main ideas of complex material, interact with substantial independence and communicate clear, detailed viewpoints on a wide range of subjects.
C1 users can understand demanding material, express ideas fluently and flexibly, and use English effectively for social, academic and professional purposes.
C2 users can understand virtually everything they hear or read, synthesise information from different sources and communicate precise shades of meaning with ease.
Four-skill comparison
This practical chart paraphrases typical abilities at each level. It is a concise guide, not a replacement for the complete Council of Europe descriptor scales.
| Level | Listening | Reading | Speaking | Writing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Recognise familiar words and simple phrases spoken slowly. | Understand names, signs and very short texts. | Use basic phrases to introduce yourself and meet immediate needs. | Complete simple forms and write very short messages. |
| A2 | Understand common expressions about everyday priorities. | Read short routine texts and find predictable information. | Handle simple exchanges about familiar activities. | Write brief notes and simple personal descriptions. |
| B1 | Follow the main points of clear speech on familiar matters. | Understand straightforward factual texts and personal correspondence. | Manage travel situations and explain experiences or plans. | Produce connected text on familiar or personally relevant topics. |
| B2 | Understand extended speech and the main ideas of complex talks. | Read articles and reports that express viewpoints or arguments. | Interact with fluency and explain a position in detail. | Write clear, detailed texts and support a point of view. |
| C1 | Follow extended discourse even when ideas are not explicitly signposted. | Understand long, complex factual and literary texts. | Express ideas fluently, precisely and appropriately for context. | Write structured, detailed texts in an assured style. |
| C2 | Understand virtually any spoken language, including rapid delivery. | Read complex and abstract texts with fine understanding. | Communicate effortlessly while conveying subtle distinctions. | Write sophisticated, precise texts for specialist audiences. |
The full CEFR also considers interaction, mediation, communication strategies and other dimensions. Teachers should select descriptors relevant to the learner, context and task rather than using every descriptor at once.
CEFR for English teachers
CEFR becomes pedagogically useful when teachers turn level descriptors into suitable objectives, learning experiences and evidence of progress.
Build a profile of what learners can currently do across listening, reading, speaking and writing instead of relying on a single overall label.
Turn broad course aims into observable outcomes, such as giving reasons for an opinion or understanding the main point of a workplace discussion.
Select texts, recordings and tasks with language demands that challenge learners without making participation unrealistic.
Connect the lesson objective, input, practice and assessment to an appropriate level of communicative independence.
Adapt support, task complexity and expected output when learners in one class show different CEFR profiles.
Use level-informed criteria to review range, accuracy, fluency, interaction, coherence and task achievement.
Compare evidence over time and identify which language skill has improved and which still needs focused teaching.
Sequence outcomes across a programme so that lessons contribute to a coherent progression rather than a disconnected list of grammar points.
Relate classroom development to the language demands of an external exam while remembering that CEFR itself is not an examination.
CEFR in TESOL practice
A level label should lead to an observable outcome. The teacher then chooses input, support and assessment evidence that match the communicative demand. This alignment helps prevent lessons from becoming a sequence of activities with no clear measure of learning.
Learn to apply CEFR in English teachingExample: planning a B1 English lesson
Objective
By the end of the lesson, learners can describe a past experience and give simple reasons for their opinions.
Input
A short model story with clear sequencing language, past forms and expressions for giving reasons.
Activity
Learners plan and exchange stories, ask follow-up questions and improve their account after feedback.
Assessment
The teacher checks whether the learner communicates a connected sequence, relevant detail and understandable reasons.
Framework and examinations
CEFR describes proficiency. IELTS and Cambridge English qualifications assess performance under their own test specifications. The comparisons below are broad orientation only.
| CEFR | User band | Approximate IELTS orientation | Related Cambridge English qualification |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Basic User | Below the main IELTS reporting range | A1 Movers / introductory ability |
| A2 | Basic User | Approximately 3.0–3.5 | A2 Key |
| B1 | Independent User | Approximately 4.0–5.0 | B1 Preliminary |
| B2 | Independent User | Approximately 5.5–6.5 | B2 First |
| C1 | Proficient User | Approximately 7.0–8.0 | C1 Advanced |
| C2 | Proficient User | Approximately 8.5–9.0 | C2 Proficiency |
Start with the purpose of the assessment. A short placement test can estimate where to begin a course, but it may not measure every skill or provide formal proof of proficiency. A fuller profile considers listening, reading, spoken production, interaction and writing through tasks appropriate to the intended use.
It is normal for skills to differ. Someone may understand B2-level reading while producing B1-level spoken language. Use the result as evidence for planning, not as a permanent identity, and check what kind of proof an employer, university or authority actually requires.
Take our free English level testProgress is rarely even across all skills. Build a plan around the gap between current evidence and the next useful outcome. A learner moving from B1 towards B2, for example, may need longer listening texts, more sustained interaction, broader vocabulary, clearer argument structure and more independent editing.
Choose the right evidence
Different tools answer different questions. Before accepting a CEFR label, check what was assessed, how the result was produced and whether the evidence suits your purpose. A useful classroom estimate is not automatically valid proof for a university, employer or immigration authority.
A self-assessment checklist helps learners reflect on familiar tasks, set goals and notice changes over time. It is most useful when each judgement is supported by examples of real work. Because confidence and interpretation vary, self-ratings should be combined with teacher feedback or performance tasks when accuracy matters.
A placement test helps a school select a suitable starting class, while diagnostic tasks reveal strengths and learning needs. Short online tests often focus on reading, vocabulary and grammar because those areas are easy to score. Treat the result as an approximate indication unless speaking, listening and writing have also been assessed.
A recognised examination uses defined tasks, scoring procedures and reporting rules. This may be required when a third party needs verified evidence. Always confirm which examination, score, skill profile and validity period the receiving organisation accepts; a general CEFR claim alone may not meet its requirements.
Editorial review

Cambridge Veritas Teacher Training Academic Team
PhD, City, University of London; English teacher and course creator with 15+ years of training experience across five countries.
Primary references
Cambridge Veritas did not create or administer CEFR. This guide should be read alongside current resources from the framework owner and relevant examination organisations.
Clear answers
CEFR means the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. It is an international framework used to describe language ability through six levels from A1 to C2.
The six levels are A1, A2, B1, B2, C1 and C2. A1–A2 are Basic User levels, B1–B2 are Independent User levels, and C1–C2 are Proficient User levels.
B2 is an Independent User level. A B2 learner can generally understand the main ideas of complex material, interact with substantial independence and communicate clear, detailed viewpoints.
Fluency is not a single fixed CEFR point. Many learners operate independently at B2, while C1 indicates flexible advanced use and C2 indicates highly proficient control. The appropriate target depends on the situation.
Use evidence from several skills. A short placement test can provide an approximate indication, while a fuller evaluation may include listening, reading, speaking and writing assessed against relevant descriptors.
No. CEFR is a proficiency framework, not an examination or awarding body. Tests and qualifications may report results against CEFR levels, but their own assessment and certification rules apply.
Yes. A learner may read at a higher level than they speak, or understand more than they can write. Teachers should consider the skill profile rather than assuming one score describes every ability equally.
Teachers use CEFR to define learning outcomes, select materials, plan lessons, differentiate mixed-level classes, assess performance, track progress and design coherent syllabi.
IELTS and Cambridge English qualifications are assessments, while CEFR is a descriptive framework. Score-to-level comparisons are approximate and should always be checked against current guidance from the examining body.
There is no universal number of hours. Progress depends on the starting profile, learning intensity, quality of feedback, opportunities to use English, the skill being developed and the distance between levels.
Learners can begin with an approximate level indication. Teachers can explore how CEFR outcomes connect to structured TESOL lesson planning, teaching practice and assessment.